ありがとう！

よろしくね！

Either way, Khatzu’s method seems to me, to be the most user friendly way to connect to another language. That’s what it’s all about anyways, making connections. The reason why this is the best way to do so is because no single person learns or makes connections the same way as another, and self study seems to be the best way to go, especially when tackling language. When compared to your native language, using a non-native language is like a second view point to connections that have already been made from your first encounter of the object in question. Discovery, probability, experimentation, research, and even chance, are some of the things that make learning Japanese fun for me because everytime I encounter something new when trying to use the foreign language, I always have the connections made by my native language to help back me up.

I’ve reached a point in my Japanese study where I have started to make new connections to the language without having to refer to, or look up what certain things mean in my native language and it puts a smile on my face everytime it happens. When that starts to happen, you know your close to fluency when connections just “start to happen without thinking about them”. I think I’ve already said too much, yes I have a bad habit of writing a huge story of something that could very well be condensed into something smaller.

One more thing, before jumping into the world of sentence mining (for people who are at that point) it is tiring and sometimes can have a negative effect on your understanding of certain parts of the language. But, the fact that sentences have a gold mine of new information avaliable to you such as: grammar, new word definitions, and native-only understandings of specific groups of words and phrases keep you plucking away, sentence after sentence until you’ve made enough connections to understand without reference. I’ve found an incredibly simple alternative, I shouldn’t say alternative, maybe “aid” is better meaning to help you along with understanding. It is costly but simple: The Rosetta Stone software. I’m telling you, even though on their commercials and website it says that Rosetta Stone is used for becoming “conversationally fluent” only, that is complete BS when concerning East Asian languages.

When you get the Japanese version of the software, it’s total immersion in your face kinda stuff. All the menu’s are in Kanji and Kana, but that’s the point, mess around with it’s interface until you make the connections to point you in the right direction. It really worked out well for me. Basically, you are given 3 options when running through the tests. You can see the written version of everything the narrator is saying in Romaji, Kana or Kanji (with some Kana). It’s great because, for example, Test 1 Frame 1 is the basics: you see pictures of certain things like a dog, cat, boy and girl. You can either make it display in Romaji: Inu, Neko, Otokonoko, Onnanoko – Kana: いぬ, ねこ, おとこのこ, おんあのこ – Kanji: 犬, 猫, 男の子, 女の子 – It’s great BECAUSE it has pictures to go along with your kanji and kana so you can make immediate relations with pictoral objects rather than mining through sentences and going into a dictionary and looking up the meaning of words you don’t know. It puts the relationships between the objects and the words right infront of your eyes so you can save ALOT of time trying to make connections! I’m sure that MANY people will find The Rosetta Stone software helpful in this respect. I have probably saved, I would say, maybe 3 to 4 months in making the spoken connection between many different situations and scenarios of words that the software produces for you.

Anyways, I’ve said too much, again lol. That’s all I have to say, and ask me any questions concerning Rosetta Stone. Talk back soon.

Anyway, I could sympathize most when he told us to treat our brain like our muscles and force it to do exercises. My daily Mnemosyne drills often feels very like so :).

Well, 皆頑張れ！